Discussion:
RELIGIOUS - ATHEIST INTEREST
(too old to reply)
Bill M
2007-09-30 12:59:36 UTC
Permalink
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.

Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;

ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000

There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.

It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
Peter Kelsey
2007-09-30 18:07:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".

Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Bill M
2007-09-30 13:15:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
What does this rant supply?

When are you going to supply some 'evidence' to support your rant?
Peter Kelsey
2007-09-30 18:17:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
What does this rant supply?
When are you going to supply some 'evidence' to support your rant?
The "evidence" is your own post, you ignorant sot.

So, can we pay you to switch sides? We could start a collection...
Bill M
2007-09-30 18:31:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
What does this rant supply?
When are you going to supply some 'evidence' to support your rant?
The "evidence" is your own post, you ignorant sot.
So, can we pay you to switch sides? We could start a collection...
Your revealing your low intelligence by your need to resort to slander
and insults.

You never seem capable of supplying objective evidence or alternate claims.

Go get an education and learn civility.
Peter Kelsey
2007-09-30 23:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Your revealing your low intelligence by your need to resort to slander
and insults.
Sorry, sonny. It's not "slander" of it's true.

You're kinda screwed, aren't you?

LOL!!
Midnight
2007-10-01 15:13:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Go get an education and learn civility.
I've never yet seen you demonstrate civility, Bill, so don't be a
hypocrite. And Peter was right: you're not making a good case for atheists
as guardians of common sense and rationality.

Fortunately I know enough not to judge all on the example of one, and I
know enough not to condemn a point of view based solely on its more
extremist holders.
Bill M
2007-10-01 15:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Midnight
Post by Bill M
Go get an education and learn civility.
I've never yet seen you demonstrate civility, Bill, so don't be a
hypocrite. And Peter was right: you're not making a good case for atheists
as guardians of common sense and rationality.
Exactly where did I ever engage in the incivility you claim?
Post by Midnight
Fortunately I know enough not to judge all on the example of one, and I
know enough not to condemn a point of view based solely on its more
extremist holders.
bob young
2007-10-02 04:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Post by Midnight
Post by Bill M
Go get an education and learn civility.
I've never yet seen you demonstrate civility, Bill, so don't be a
hypocrite. And Peter was right: you're not making a good case for atheists
as guardians of common sense and rationality.
Exactly where did I ever engage in the incivility you claim?
I was going to say the same thing, never seen any
Post by Bill M
Post by Midnight
Fortunately I know enough not to judge all on the example of one, and I
know enough not to condemn a point of view based solely on its more
extremist holders.
Midnight
2007-10-02 08:08:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Post by Midnight
I've never yet seen you demonstrate civility, Bill, so don't be a
hypocrite. And Peter was right: you're not making a good case for atheists
as guardians of common sense and rationality.
Exactly where did I ever engage in the incivility you claim?
Get your head out of your imaginary God's ass.
Your showing your ignorence again.
That is a meanful reply to idiots like you.
Get some knowledge before posting your nonsense.
Wow, your showing off your ignorence again.
Have you now finished the first grade?
Would you argue that these qualify as being 'civil'? If so, we're clearly
operating from very different definitions of the word.
bob young
2007-10-02 09:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Midnight
Post by Bill M
Post by Midnight
I've never yet seen you demonstrate civility, Bill, so don't be a
hypocrite. And Peter was right: you're not making a good case for atheists
as guardians of common sense and rationality.
Exactly where did I ever engage in the incivility you claim?
Get your head out of your imaginary God's ass.
Your showing your ignorence again.
That is a meanful reply to idiots like you.
Get some knowledge before posting your nonsense.
Wow, your showing off your ignorence again.
Have you now finished the first grade?
Would you argue that these qualify as being 'civil'? If so, we're clearly
operating from very different definitions of the word.
Yes I would but there is just one problem.

The stuff above was not written by me.

Kindly investigate and perhaps get back to me again.

Thanks

Bob
Midnight
2007-10-02 14:33:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
Yes I would but there is just one problem.
The stuff above was not written by me.
Kindly investigate and perhaps get back to me again.
Now that's interesting. I always thought you were just incredibly
sycophantic towards Bill, bob. I thought you just indulged in a lot of
mutual back-slapping. Are you actually a sockpuppet of Bill's?
bob young
2007-10-03 03:56:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Midnight
Post by bob young
Yes I would but there is just one problem.
The stuff above was not written by me.
Kindly investigate and perhaps get back to me again.
Now that's interesting. I always thought you were just incredibly
sycophantic towards Bill, bob. I thought you just indulged in a lot of
mutual back-slapping. Are you actually a sockpuppet of Bill's?
As an atheist I am likely to agree with most of what Bill says.

As for mutual back slapping there's tons of the saccharine stuff going on
between fundies here all the time

The laughable part is - they do it to prop up a myth.

Hey have a good week

Bob
Midnight
2007-10-03 08:39:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
As an atheist I am likely to agree with most of what Bill says.
As for mutual back slapping there's tons of the saccharine stuff going on
between fundies here all the time
The laughable part is - they do it to prop up a myth.
So you've worked out that I replied to Bill and that I KNEW I'd replied to
Bill? That you leapt in and defended yourself against something I hadn't
accused you of? Good.
Post by bob young
Hey have a good week
I realise this was entirely insincere on your part, but I try not to be
ungracious: you too.
bob young
2007-10-03 09:18:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Midnight
Post by bob young
As an atheist I am likely to agree with most of what Bill says.
As for mutual back slapping there's tons of the saccharine stuff going on
between fundies here all the time
The laughable part is - they do it to prop up a myth.
So you've worked out that I replied to Bill and that I KNEW I'd replied to
Bill? That you leapt in and defended yourself against something I hadn't
accused you of? Good.
What ?
Post by Midnight
Post by bob young
Hey have a good week
I realise this was entirely insincere on your part, but I try not to be
ungracious: you too.
Yes it is strange isn't it, folks here seem to be devoid of sincerity, but i
cannot understand what I could have meant other than 'have a good week' we
have been chatting for quite a while now.

Bob
Pastor Frank
2007-10-03 02:30:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Midnight
Post by bob young
Yes I would but there is just one problem.
The stuff above was not written by me.
Kindly investigate and perhaps get back to me again.
Now that's interesting. I always thought you were just incredibly
sycophantic towards Bill, bob. I thought you just indulged in a lot of
mutual back-slapping. Are you actually a sockpuppet of Bill's?
Atheism is a Mutual Admiration Society, didn't you know that? We would
rather admire Jesus Christ than each other.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Midnight
2007-10-03 12:28:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pastor Frank
Atheism is a Mutual Admiration Society, didn't you know that? We would
rather admire Jesus Christ than each other.
Oh, be quiet, Frank.
John Smith
2007-10-03 13:19:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pastor Frank
Post by Midnight
Post by bob young
Yes I would but there is just one problem.
The stuff above was not written by me.
Kindly investigate and perhaps get back to me again.
Now that's interesting. I always thought you were just incredibly
sycophantic towards Bill, bob. I thought you just indulged in a lot of
mutual back-slapping. Are you actually a sockpuppet of Bill's?
Atheism is a Mutual Admiration Society, didn't you know that? We would
rather admire Jesus Christ than each other.
Bwahahaaaa... you are living proof that many theists are nothing more than
egomaniacs.

Virgil
2007-09-30 18:56:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Don't be so critical. The logic, poor as it is, is a good deal better
than anything any theists have managed to post here yet.
Peter Kelsey
2007-09-30 18:58:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Virgil
Don't be so critical. The logic, poor as it is, is a good deal better
than anything any theists have managed to post here yet.
Agreed. But, there's no reason why we shouldn't hold
OURSELVES to a higher standard. :)
bob young
2007-10-01 08:52:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Stick around Bill we will never please all of the people all of the time.

I noticed the size of atheistic posts some time back, it makes yer think !

Bob
Bill M
2007-10-01 16:01:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Stick around Bill we will never please all of the people all of the time.
I noticed the size of atheistic posts some time back, it makes yer think !
Bob
Thanks.

I suspect this information rattled their cages so they feel the need to
trash out with their nonsense.
Peter Kelsey
2007-10-01 21:07:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Stick around Bill we will never please all of the people all of the time.
I noticed the size of atheistic posts some time back, it makes yer think !
Bob
Thanks.
I suspect this information rattled their cages so they feel the need to
trash out with their nonsense.
As usual, you "suspect" wrong. You just don't seem to have a clue,
do you?
bob young
2007-10-02 04:02:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Stick around Bill we will never please all of the people all of the time.
I noticed the size of atheistic posts some time back, it makes yer think !
Bob
Thanks.
I suspect this information rattled their cages so they feel the need to
trash out with their nonsense.
As usual, you "suspect" wrong. You just don't seem to have a clue,
do you?
Do too. the 'clue' that the cage is being rattled in extreme frustration
usually starts with a few nasty remarks from inside the cage.

I have said it before 'I would hate to be a religionist here trying to justify
my myths using logic'
Peter Kelsey
2007-10-02 10:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Stick around Bill we will never please all of the people all of the time.
I noticed the size of atheistic posts some time back, it makes yer think !
Bob
Thanks.
I suspect this information rattled their cages so they feel the need to
trash out with their nonsense.
As usual, you "suspect" wrong. You just don't seem to have a clue,
do you?
Do too. the 'clue' that the cage is being rattled in extreme frustration
usually starts with a few nasty remarks from inside the cage.
I have said it before 'I would hate to be a religionist here trying to justify
my myths using logic'
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!

LOL!
bob young
2007-10-02 12:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
You really are an simplistic kinda guy, aren't you? And
your knowledge of usenet (and statistics) would seem to
be roughly on par with your understanding of logic...
i.e., "nonexistent".
Sigh... you really ARE making us thinking atheists/agnostics
look bad. Could we POSSIBLY pay you to switch to the other side?
Stick around Bill we will never please all of the people all of the time.
I noticed the size of atheistic posts some time back, it makes yer think !
Bob
Thanks.
I suspect this information rattled their cages so they feel the need to
trash out with their nonsense.
As usual, you "suspect" wrong. You just don't seem to have a clue,
do you?
Do too. the 'clue' that the cage is being rattled in extreme frustration
usually starts with a few nasty remarks from inside the cage.
I have said it before 'I would hate to be a religionist here trying to justify
my myths using logic'
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.

If that is the best you can do then ..............do YOU have a clue?

and if so what is it - over to you
Post by Peter Kelsey
LOL!
Peter Kelsey
2007-10-02 21:13:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue
Intelligent dialogue? With YOU two??

ROFLMAO!
Post by bob young
is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.
Just those that don't. You, for example, couldn't catch a clue
if you covered yourself in "clue musk" and did the "clue mating
dance" in the middle of a HERD of horny clues at the height of
"clue mating season".
Bill M
2007-10-02 21:26:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue
Intelligent dialogue? With YOU two??
ROFLMAO!
Post by bob young
is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.
Just those that don't. You, for example, couldn't catch a clue
if you covered yourself in "clue musk" and did the "clue mating
dance" in the middle of a HERD of horny clues at the height of
"clue mating season".
Bob Young and I post objective verifiable facts.

Because you cannot deal with the message you engage in old idiot tactic of
"shoot the messenger"!
Peter Kelsey
2007-10-02 22:36:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue
Intelligent dialogue? With YOU two??
ROFLMAO!
Post by bob young
is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.
Just those that don't. You, for example, couldn't catch a clue
if you covered yourself in "clue musk" and did the "clue mating
dance" in the middle of a HERD of horny clues at the height of
"clue mating season".
Bob Young and I post objective verifiable facts.
Heh heh. You should do standup.
Post by Bill M
Because you cannot deal with the message you engage in old idiot tactic of
"shoot the messenger"!
Hey, when I have to deal with idiots, using "old idiot tactics"
is the preferred method.
bob young
2007-10-03 03:53:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue
Intelligent dialogue? With YOU two??
ROFLMAO!
Post by bob young
is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.
Just those that don't. You, for example, couldn't catch a clue
if you covered yourself in "clue musk" and did the "clue mating
dance" in the middle of a HERD of horny clues at the height of
"clue mating season".
Bob Young and I post objective verifiable facts.
Because you cannot deal with the message you engage in old idiot tactic of
"shoot the messenger"!
I plonk all sickos after giving them a fair chance to show otherwise.

Just plonked this one for good
bob young
2007-10-03 03:52:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue
Intelligent dialogue? With YOU two??
ROFLMAO!
Post by bob young
is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.
Just those that don't. You, for example, couldn't catch a clue
if you covered yourself in "clue musk" and did the "clue mating
dance" in the middle of a HERD of horny clues at the height of
"clue mating season".
too bad you are not clever enough to write anything adult and
intelligent.

as they say - "It takes all kinds"

PLONK ASShole
Peter Kelsey
2007-10-03 10:07:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
Post by bob young
Post by Peter Kelsey
If Bill ever accidentally trips across some "logic", you let
us know, OK?? Oh wait. That would presume YOU'D recognize it!
Seems your idea of having an intelligent dialogue
Intelligent dialogue? With YOU two??
ROFLMAO!
Post by bob young
is constantly accusing people of
not having a clue.
Just those that don't. You, for example, couldn't catch a clue
if you covered yourself in "clue musk" and did the "clue mating
dance" in the middle of a HERD of horny clues at the height of
"clue mating season".
too bad you are not clever enough to write anything adult and
intelligent.
As I said, I'm just trying to keep it down on your level.
Post by bob young
as they say - "It takes all kinds"
PLONK ASShole
You really don't need to SIGN your posts...
Snowman
2007-10-01 01:50:36 UTC
Permalink
On Sep 30, 8:59 am, "Bill M" <***@bellsouth.net> wrote:
"It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.

There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined."


I'd say most of that is the result of cross-posting.
Midnight
2007-10-01 15:23:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the
religionists.
As Snowman has pointed out, to draw a conclusion from those numbers would
be difficult. What I asume you're grasping for is the idea that there
are more atheist posters than religious ones - but simply quoting the
post figures won't help you there. After all, I regularly read posts
from you, Bill - yet of the groups you've listed I'm subscribed only to
alt.religion.christian. Therefore by the argument you appear to be
making here, you yourself are contributing, by your crossposting, to the
presumed 'interest and perhaps belief' in Christianity.

I presume, as Snowman suggests, that a significant proportion of all the
groups you've listed will be crossposts, off-topic and spam; many of the
posts in the counts above will have appeared in more than one of the
listed groups. There are always those people who post large quantities
of tenuously-relevant posts, if they're related to the group subject at
all, to a favoured group because of some specific agenda or campaign,
without really having any interest in whether or not anyone is reading.

In other words, you make a weak argument here because not only is the
evidence you provide open to serious question, it's also not at all clear
what point you're trying to make. Atheists frequently argue that reality
isn't a democracy: just because n billion people believe a given thing
doesn't mean that it's true - and that's absolutely right. Yet here we
have an atheist - granted one of the more ranty, fundamentalist ones -
apparently arguing precisely the opposite: that because there are more
posts in one of the above groups, the position on which that group is
centred must have some kind of added credibility.
bob young
2007-10-02 04:11:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Midnight
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
As Snowman has pointed out, to draw a conclusion from those numbers would
be difficult. What I asume you're grasping for is the idea that there
are more atheist posters than religious ones - but simply quoting the
post figures won't help you there. After all, I regularly read posts
from you, Bill - yet of the groups you've listed I'm subscribed only to
alt.religion.christian. Therefore by the argument you appear to be
making here, you yourself are contributing, by your crossposting, to the
presumed 'interest and perhaps belief' in Christianity.
It is of no matter whether or not there are more Christians than atheists,
what matters is
whether claims by either side can be matched with verifiable proofs, and
which way are the trends.

When I was a kid in Britain sixty years ago the churches were full of a
Sunday, today a good many have been closed down due to poor attendance. The
same thing can be said for most of Europe. Religion is propped up in
America by money, as we all know, trouble is some of that money is taken
from widows savings, widows who think they are buying themselves a ticket to
heaven, like the squires in England did in medieval times.

We have yet to see any proof of any god

What can be proved. albeit incomplete, is the existence of a very long list
of gods that man had worshipped over the eons. Those from back in the Stone
Age have been lost in time, but those hairy fellas back then did, after all
start, the whole thing off.

Cheers

Bob
humanist Brit,
Post by Midnight
I presume, as Snowman suggests, that a significant proportion of all the
groups you've listed will be crossposts, off-topic and spam; many of the
posts in the counts above will have appeared in more than one of the
listed groups. There are always those people who post large quantities
of tenuously-relevant posts, if they're related to the group subject at
all, to a favoured group because of some specific agenda or campaign,
without really having any interest in whether or not anyone is reading.
In other words, you make a weak argument here because not only is the
evidence you provide open to serious question, it's also not at all clear
what point you're trying to make. Atheists frequently argue that reality
isn't a democracy: just because n billion people believe a given thing
doesn't mean that it's true - and that's absolutely right. Yet here we
have an atheist - granted one of the more ranty, fundamentalist ones -
apparently arguing precisely the opposite: that because there are more
posts in one of the above groups, the position on which that group is
centred must have some kind of added credibility.
Midnight
2007-10-02 07:42:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by bob young
It is of no matter whether or not there are more Christians than
atheists, what matters is
whether claims by either side can be matched with verifiable proofs,
and which way are the trends.
That's true. But unfortunately, the counts Bill provided as the basis of
his point in this thread don't show us any sort of trend, because they're
not reliable data for that purpose, as already pointed out.
V
2007-10-02 23:28:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill M
It appears there is much more interest and perhaps belief
in Atheism than there is in religion.
Following is the number of posts in these Newsgroups;
ATHEISM 922,000
RELIGION, GODS 12,400
RELIGION,CHRISTIAN 293,000
RELIGION 140,000
RELIGION.ALL.WORLDS 3,000
CHRISTIAN.RELIGION 48,000
There appears to be more interest in Alt.atheism than in
in all the religious groups combined.
It appears atheist are more prevelant on the Internet than the religionists.
Yes, many people are interested in what atheists think. The trouble
is, you can seldom get atheists to offer his or her honest thoughts.
They skirt around the topic, scared they may say the wrong thing which
would undermine their dogmatic skepticism.

The reason people generally don't like the atheist is that they are an
unknown quantity. With Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, (to a
lesser degree) people can look at their religious guidelines and see
what the person stands for and how they supposedly apply their
spiritual beliefs in everyday life.

In addition, many atheists here are extreme, militant atheists and
that draws attention, albeit negative attention, through their hate
filled message.

The moderate theist accepts a moderate atheist, just as a moderate
atheist accepts a moderate theist. It is out of balance, extreme views
that sets one apart.

Problems within society do not come from Muslims...the problems come
from extreme Muslims. Same with all the rest whether Christian or
Atheist...seek balance...seek inner peace within and with all.

As soon as one becomes a dogmatic skeptic or a dogmatic theist, they
are headed for extremism and they put truth on the back burner.

Greywolf brought up a few complaints about Christians that are not
treating him right.

When such theists do not walk the talk they espouse, they probably
need a little help.

After all, we are all human and make mistakes, we get off track and
take the wrong direction once in a while. When this happens give em
some KIND help and let go of the desire of the hate filled message you
are tempted to deliver.

In my own life, I seldom get much success by guiding people on the
right track, but I still work in the right direction, and do not have
expectations of success or failure with my work...I just do it!

Remember, expectations are pre-planned resentments, so work blind when
it comes to expectations.

Even though most atheists are unknown quantities, the atheists have a
set of guidelines to live by if they are secular humanists.

So if you are dealing with an atheist that is rubbing you wrong, ask
them if they are a secular humanist and if so, review the creed of
their 'religion' and the Affirmations of Humanism with them and give
em a little help if need be. We are all here to help each other
out...are we not?

Atheist Creed http://www.atheists.org/Atheism/

An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god. An Atheist believes
that heaven is something for which we should work now - here on earth
for all men together to enjoy.

An Atheist believes that he can get no help through prayer but that he
must find in himself the inner conviction, and strength to meet life,
to grapple with it, to subdue it and enjoy it.

An Atheist believes that only in a knowledge of himself and a
knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will
help to a life of fulfillment. He seeks to know himself and his fellow
man rather than to know a god. An Atheist believes that a hospital
should be built instead of a church.

An Atheist believes that a deed must be done instead of a prayer
said.

An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death.
He wants disease conquered, poverty vanquished, war eliminated. He
wants man to understand and love man.

He wants an ethical way of life. He believes that we cannot rely on a
god or channel action into prayer nor hope for an end of troubles in a
hereafter.

He believes that we are our brother's keepers; and are keepers of our
own lives; that we are responsible persons and the job is here and the
time is now."


"The Affirmations of Humanism: A Statement of Principles"

� We are committed to the application of reason and science to the
understanding of the universe and to the solving of human problems.

� We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, to seek to
explain the world in supernatural terms, and to look outside nature
for salvation.

� We believe that scientific discovery and technology can contribute
to the betterment of human life.

� We believe in an open and pluralistic society and that democracy is
the best guarantee of protecting human rights from authoritarian
elites and repressive majorities.

� We are committed to the principle of the separation of church and
state.

� We cultivate the arts of negotiation and compromise as a means of
resolving differences and achieving mutual understanding.

� We are concerned with securing justice and fairness in society and
with eliminating discrimination and intolerance.

� We believe in supporting the disadvantaged and the handicapped so
that they will be able to help themselves.

� We attempt to transcend divisive parochial loyalties based on race,
religion, gender, nationality, creed, class, sexual orientation, or
ethnicity, and strive to work together for the common good of
humanity.

� We want to protect and enhance the earth, to preserve it for future
generations, and to avoid inflicting needless suffering on other
species.

� We believe in enjoying life here and now and in developing our
creative talents to their fullest.

� We believe in the cultivation of moral excellence.

� We respect the right to privacy. Mature adults should be allowed to
fulfill their aspirations, to express their sexual preferences, to
exercise reproductive freedom, to have access to comprehensive and
informed health-care, and to die with dignity.

� We believe in the common moral decencies: altruism, integrity,
honesty, truthfulness, responsibility. Humanist ethics is amenable to
critical, rational guidance. There are normative standards that we
discover together. Moral principles are tested by their consequences.

� We are deeply concerned with the moral education of our children. We
want to nourish reason and compassion.

� We are engaged by the arts no less than by the sciences.

� We are citizens of the universe and are excited by discoveries still
to be made in the cosmos.

� We are skeptical of untested claims to knowledge, and we are open to
novel ideas and seek new departures in our thinking.

� We affirm humanism as a realistic alternative to theologies of
despair and ideologies of violence and as a source of rich personal
significance and genuine satisfaction in the service to others.

� We believe in optimism rather than pessimism, hope rather than
despair, learning in the place of dogma, truth instead of ignorance,
joy rather than guilt or sin, tolerance in the place of fear, love
instead of hatred, compassion over selfishness, beauty instead of
ugliness, and reason rather than blind faith or irrationality.

� We believe in the fullest realization of the best and noblest that
we are capable of as human beings.

Council for Secular Humanism



Buddhists?

They subscribe to The Eightfold Path & The Five Precepts

"The Eightfold Path"

1. Right View
2. Right Intention
3. Right Speech
4. Right Action
5. Right Livelihood
6. Right Effort
7. Right Mindfulness
8. Right Concentration

The Five precepts are the 'commandments' more or less for Buddhists.
Although they are not commanded to do a thing. If they wish to live at
peace, then they proceed the best they can - but it is their choice.

"The Five Precepts"

1. Refrain from Killing
2. Refrain from Stealing
3. Refrain from Sexual Misconduct
4. Refrain from False Speech
5. Refrain from the Use of Intoxicants


Christians?

They can be boiled down to 'love thy neighbor as thyself.'

Christians try to avoid the seven deadly sins:

Pride
Lust
Sloth
Greed
Gluttony
Wrath
Envy

Aren't these seven deadly sins good for all of us to avoid in
general...even the atheists???

Additional Christian virtues are comprised of The Corporal Works of
Mercy and The Spiritual Works of Mercy

"The Corporal Works of Mercy"

To feed the hungry
To give drink to the thirsty
To clothe the naked
To harbour the harbourless
To visit the sick
To ransom the captive
To bury the dead

"The Spiritual Works of Mercy"

To instruct the ignorant
To counsel the doubtful
To admonish sinners
To bear wrongs patiently
To forgive offenses willingly
To comfort the afflicted
To pray for the living and the dead

Talk of spiritual studies Al Klein?

Spiritual values and atheists do not generally mix.

You see Al, spiritual work involves what cannot be seen. This 'working
with the invisible' is what distinguishes the corporal from the
spiritual my friend.

I am not always referring to organized religion when I use such terms.
Atheist or not, there are many unseen and supernatural mysteries in
the world. The spiritual studies deals with such mysteries, for the
root of spiritualism is that of the unseen and the force behind it
all.

Yes, spiritual concepts are hard to define, just as the source of the
wind is hard to define. Since spiritual matters deal with the unseen
and the unknown, how can we define them perfectly? If we could do that
they would not be spiritual studies. You can't see why one person is
loving and kind and another person is a fiend of perennial shame, hate
and destruction. Nor can you see what made the hate monger change into
a kind and loving human.

We can describe spiritual concepts and the journey that made the
change possible, but it is impossible to put our finger on it all
exactly. Spiritual growth is a journey that is a never ending, an
imperfect process in this life. But just as we can see the effects of
the wind, while being blind to its source; we can most definitely see
the difference in people that incorporate spiritual values within
their lives when compared to people that live a life devoid of any
spiritual values.

"No man is so wise that he may not easily err if he takes no other
counsel than his own. He that is taught only by himself has a fool for
a master." Ben Jonson

No one said we have to 'investigate it all,' but we do have to give it
some thought if we wish to be at peace Al.

A Hindu sage once told me "Just as water floes downhill without effort
but requires outside forces and energy to make it move uphill. So the
human consciousness falls to its lowest levels of the senses without
effort and energies to make our consciousness gravitate to more than
our base desires."

As such without effort the defiance based atheists sinks deeper and
deeper into sickness and tragedy as time goes by. And this ugly life
you have created for yourself Al can be change simply by taking that
first step in the opposite direction that you have been headed in all
your life my friend.

Same advice for Raven, Robibnikoff, Mark K. Bilbo, Michael Gray, Kate,
Floyd, Neil Kelsey, Michelle Milkin, Ghod, Parsifa, Martin, Lucifer,
Syd M, John #1782, Enkidu, Hollis, Gail, Rev. Karl E. Taylor, Martin,
BuddyThunder, NC, Stoney, Medusa, David Silverman aka Sanity's Little
Helper...you can all have a new life this very instant..the only thing
holding you back is your ego. Drop the ego and find peace and joy. I
will be glad to guide any of you on the journey, all you have to do is
to write me direct and we can start immediately. I charge nothing and
expect nothing - I only offer peace to you.


Getting back to the monotheists and trying to figure out Islam?

They are a little tougher to decipher than the Christians or
Buddhists, especially since most of their religion is based in foreign
languages and not translated as readily into the English.

In addition, many extreme factions that bend things to suit their ego
based need. In any case, they have along list of excellent guidelines
to live by. But really the monotheist of Jews, Christians and Islam
all worship the same God of Yahweh. Islam just calls Yahweh by the
name of Allah.

Here are the guidelines from the Qur'an.

1. Respect and honour all human beings irrespective of their
religion,
colour, race, sex, language, status, property, birth, profession/job
and so on [Qur'an17/70]

2. Talk straight, to the point, without any ambiguity or deception
[Qur'an33/70]

3. Choose best words to speak and say them in the best possible way
[Qur'an17/53, 2/83]

4. Do not shout. Speak politely keeping your voice low. [Qur'an31/19]

5. Always speak the truth. Shun words that are deceitful and
ostentatious [Qur'an22/30]

6. Do not confound truth with falsehood [Qur'an2/42]

7. Say with your mouth what is in your heart [Qur'an3/167]

8. Speak in a civilised manner in a language that is recognised by
the
society and is commonly used [Qur'an4/5]

9. When you voice an opinion, be just, even if it is against a
relative [Qur'an6/152]

10. Do not be a bragging boaster [Qur'an31/18]

11. Do not talk, listen or do anything vain [Qur'an23/3, 28/55]

12. Do not participate in any paltry. If you pass near a futile play,
then pass by with dignity [Qur'an25/72]

13. Do not verge upon any immodesty or lewdness whether surreptitious
or overt [Qur'an6/151]

14. If, unintentionally, any misconduct occurs by you, then correct
yourself expeditiously [Qur'an3/134]

15. Do not be contemptuous or arrogant with people [Qur'an31/18]

16. Do not walk haughtily or with conceit [Qur'an17/37, 31/18]

17. Be moderate in thy pace [Qur'an31/19]

18. Walk with humility and sedateness [Qur'an25/63]

19. Keep your gazes lowered devoid of any lecherous leers and
salacious stares [Qur'an24/30-31, 40/19]

20. If you do not have complete knowledge about anything, it is
better
to keep silent. You might think that speaking about something without
full knowledge is a trivial matter. But it might have grave
consequences
[Qur'an24/15-16]

21. When you hear something malicious about someone, keep a
favourable
view about him/her until you attain full knowledge about the matter.
Consider others innocent until they are proven guilty with solid and
truthful evidence [Qur'an24/12-13]

22. Ascertain the truth of any news, lest you smite someone in
ignorance and afterwards repent of what you did [Qur'an49/6]

23. Do not follow blindly any information of which you have no direct
knowledge. (Using your faculties of perception and conception) you
must verify it for yourself. In the Court of your Lord, you will be
held
accountable for your hearing, sight, and the faculty of reasoning
[Qur'an17/36]

24. Never think that you have reached the final stage of knowledge
and
nobody knows more than yourself. Remember! Above everyone endowed
with
knowledge is another endowed with more knowledge [Qur'an12/76]. Even
the Prophet [p.b.u.h] was asked to keep praying, "O My sustainer!
Advance
me in knowledge." [Qur'an20:114]

25. The believers are but a single Brotherhood. Live like members of
one family, brothers and sisters unto one another [Qur'an49/10]

26. Do not make mockery of others or ridicule others [Qur'an49/11]

27. Do not defame others [Qur'an49/11]

28. Do not insult others by nicknames [Qur'an49/11]

29. Avoid suspicion and guesswork. Suspicion and guesswork might
deplete your communal energy [Qur'an49/12]

30. Spy not upon one another [Qur'an49/12]

31. Do not backbite one another [Qur'an49/12]

32. When you meet each other, offer good wishes and blessings for
safety. One who conveys to you a message of safety and security and
also when a courteous greeting is offered to you, meet it with a
greeting
still more courteous or (at least) of equal courtesy [Qur'an4/86]

33. When you enter your own home or the home of somebody else,
compliment the inmates [Qur'an24/61]

34. Do not enter houses other than your own until you have sought
permission; and then greet the inmates and wish them a life of
blessing,purity and pleasure [Qur'an24/27]

35. Treat kindly: Your parents; Relatives; The orphans; And those who
have been left alone in the society [Qur'an4/36]

36. Take care of: The needy, The disabled, Those whose hard earned
income is insufficient to meet their needs; And those whose
businesses have stalled ; And those who have lost their jobs.
[Qur'an4/36]

37. Treat kindly: Your related neighbours, and unrelated neighbours;
Companions by your side in public gatherings, or public
transportation.[Qur'an4/36]

38. Be generous to the needy wayfarer, the homeless son of the
street,and the one who reaches you in a destitute condition
[Qur'an4/36]

39. Be nice to people who work under your care. [Qur'an4/36]

40. Do not follow up what you have given to others to afflict them
with reminders of your generosity [Qur'an2/262]

41. Do not expect a return for your good behaviour, not even thanks
[Qur'an76/9]

42. Cooperate with one another in good deeds and do not cooperate
with
others in evil and bad matters [Qur'an5/2]

43. Do no try to impress people on account of self-proclaimed virtues
[Qur'an53/32]

44. You should enjoin right conduct on others but mend your own ways
first. Actions speak louder than words. You must first practice good
deeds yourself, then preach [Qur'an2/44]

45. Correct yourself and your families first [before trying to
correct
others] [Qur'an66/6]

46. Pardon gracefully if anyone among you who commits a bad deed out
of ignorance, and then repents and amends [Qur'an6/54, 3/134]

47. Divert and sublimate your anger and potentially virulent emotions
to creative energy, and become a source of tranquillity and comfort
to
people [Qur'an3/134]

48. Call people to the Way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful
exhortation. Reason with them most decently [Qur'an16/125]

49. Leave to themselves those who do not give any importance to the
Divine code and have adopted and consider it as mere play and
amusement [Qur'an6/70]

50. Sit not in the company of those who ridicule Divine Law unless
they engage in some other conversation [Qur'an4/140]

51. Do not be jealous of those who are blessed [Qur'an4/54]

52. In your collective life, make rooms for others [Qur'an58/11]

53. When invited to dine, Go at the appointed time. Do not arrive too
early to wait for the preparation of meal or linger after eating to
engage in bootless babble. Such things may cause inconvenience to the
host [Qur'an33/53]

54. Eat and drink [what is lawful] in moderation [Qur'an7/31]

55. Do not squander your wealth senselessly [Qur'an17/26]

56. Fulfil your promises and commitments [Qur'an17/34]

57. Keep yourself clean, pure [Qur'an9/108, 4/43, 5/6]

58. Dress-up in agreeable attire and adorn yourself with exquisite
character from inside out [Qur'an7/26]

59. Seek your provision only by fair endeavour [Qur'an29/17, 2/188]

60. Do not devour the wealth and property of others unjustly, nor
bribe the officials or the judges to deprive others of their
possessions
[Qur'an2/188]


So, as I told you, if you happen upon a person in pain or not living
by their religions creed give em a little help.

Yes, we are all here to help each other out...are we not?



Take care,


V (Male)

Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
Midnight
2007-10-03 09:21:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by V
Yes, many people are interested in what atheists think. The trouble
is, you can seldom get atheists to offer his or her honest thoughts.
They skirt around the topic, scared they may say the wrong thing which
would undermine their dogmatic skepticism.
Rubbish. This might be the case for *some* atheists, just as it's the
case for some theist. Many are intelligent and open-minded - as are many
theists.

Unfortunately, there are bigots who're in it purely for the
confrontation, and they're prone to idle generalisations like yours here.
Post by V
The reason people generally don't like the atheist
There is no reason that 'people generally don't like the atheist'.
There's a reason YOU don't like atheists, and that's what's in play here.
Don't presume to speak for others than yourself.
Post by V
With Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, (to a
lesser degree) people can look at their religious guidelines and see
what the person stands for and how they supposedly apply their
spiritual beliefs in everyday life.
Nonsense. I don't know where you're posting from, but you should try
spending a few days in a Christian group. You'll see dozens of different
factions all arguing between themselves about which interpretation of the
Bible is the right one. You meet a Christian, there is only one thing
you can be sure of: they probably believe in Jesus - but even then
there's no saying exactly what they believe he is.

Similarly, if you meet an atheist, you can assume nothing at all about
them save that they don't believe in gods.
Post by V
In addition, many atheists here are extreme, militant atheists and
that draws attention, albeit negative attention, through their hate
filled message.
That's true, to some extent - but that's no safe grounds for assuming
that all, or even most, atheists are that way. Just as you're seeking
confrontation with them for reasons probably entirely unconnected with
your religion, so their desire for confrontation isn't anything to do
with their lack of it.
Post by V
Problems within society do not come from Muslims...the problems come
from extreme Muslims.
I agree - but I'd take it further and say that many of the problems in
society stem from extremists of all kinds. It's misguided to think that
all our troubles are created by extremist Muslims. But the extremists
attitude - that insistence on everything being black-and-white; that
"you're with me or against me" absoluteism - yes, that causes a huge
amount of problems.
Post by V
After all, we are all human and make mistakes, we get off track and
take the wrong direction once in a while. When this happens give em
some KIND help and let go of the desire of the hate filled message you
are tempted to deliver.
Agreed.
Post by V
In my own life, I seldom get much success by guiding people on the
right track
That's because you're an extremist yourself. As demonstrated by your
willingness to make sweeping statements about huge numbers of people, as
you have about atheists above.
Post by V
Remember, expectations are pre-planned resentments, so work blind when
it comes to expectations.
Good advice. I suggest you pay heed to it.
Post by V
Even though most atheists are unknown quantities, the atheists have a
set of guidelines to live by if they are secular humanists.
No - there is no creed that must be followed by any atheist, humanist or
not. Atheists have no such system. They live, as do most people,
religious or not, according to their own interpretation of morality.
Post by V
Atheist Creed http://www.atheists.org/Atheism/
The definition here might well be agreed upon by those who frequent
atheists.org. But it fact it makes the mistake of assuming that Atheism
[sic] is a religious system equivalent to any theistic system. The site
itself capitalises atheism - which is not required - and refers to it as
a 'doctrine'. This is incorrect. The site cites (ahem) a Supreme Court
case in which the petitioner says:

"Your petitioners are Atheists and they define their beliefs as follows"

This is incorrect. An atheist may well have beliefs - beliefs about
morality, about right and wrong - but has no specific set of beliefs
which can be inferred purely from the fact that s/he is an atheist. The
ONLY presumption that can be made with justification is the absence of
any belief in god or gods.

Be cautious if you visit the given site for information about atheism -
it appears to present a very specific view of atheism which many would
disagree with.
Post by V
An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god.
And atheist could be a real bastard and hate his fellow man. It's not
believing in god or gods that makes him an atheist.
Post by V
An Atheist believes
that heaven is something for which we should work now - here on earth
for all men together to enjoy.
An atheist might not give a toss what state we live in; and might well
have no concept of 'heaven', even in the most general sense. What makes
him an atheist is solely the fact that he doesn't believe in god or gods.
Post by V
An Atheist believes that he can get no help through prayer but that he
must find in himself the inner conviction, and strength to meet life,
to grapple with it, to subdue it and enjoy it.
This is probably general enough to go without objection.
Post by V
Pride
Lust
Sloth
Greed
Gluttony
Wrath
Envy
Aren't these seven deadly sins good for all of us to avoid in
general...even the atheists???
Of course. The only thing is, to an atheist, they're not 'sin'. 'Sin'
suggests that they're an offence against a god - and of course to someone
who doesn't believe in any gods, there's nothing to offend against.

One might argue that these are offences against one's fellow man, or even
- as I would have it - against oneself. But they can't be 'sin' unless
you have a god to offend against.
Post by V
I am not always referring to organized religion when I use such terms.
Atheist or not, there are many unseen and supernatural mysteries in
the world.
Not to an atheist. They rule out anything supernatural by definition.
(As do I, though I consider myself religious - to me, anything that
exists must be natural, otherwise it wouldn't exist.)
Post by V
A Hindu sage once told me "Just as water floes downhill without effort
but requires outside forces and energy to make it move uphill. So the
human consciousness falls to its lowest levels of the senses without
effort and energies to make our consciousness gravitate to more than
our base desires."
Sounds sensible.
Post by V
Same advice for Raven, Robibnikoff, Mark K. Bilbo, Michael Gray, Kate,
Floyd, Neil Kelsey, Michelle Milkin, Ghod, Parsifa, Martin, Lucifer,
Syd M, John #1782, Enkidu, Hollis, Gail, Rev. Karl E. Taylor, Martin,
BuddyThunder, NC, Stoney, Medusa, David Silverman aka Sanity's Little
Helper...you can all have a new life this very instant..the only thing
holding you back is your ego. Drop the ego and find peace and joy. I
will be glad to guide any of you on the journey
I'd suggest that, based on your posts to date, you're not yet in a
position to offer guidance to anyone with an ego problem. As unkind as I
realise that sounds, it's meant entirely honestly. You seem to have this
idea of yourself as a guru of sorts, but you don't show any awareness of
your self-interest.

Nevertheless, your offer of peace - if meant sincerely - is a good start.
Post by V
They are a little tougher to decipher than the Christians or
Buddhists, especially since most of their religion is based in foreign
languages and not translated as readily into the English.
The Canons and the Sutras were not originally written in English. Nor
was the Bible. The Qur'an has been translated just as effectively as
have these other texts. Perhaps the problem is not with the text, but
with the reader?
Post by V
In addition, many extreme factions that bend things to suit their ego
based need.
If you are implying that such extremism is limited to Islam, I recommend
again that you spend some time studying Christianity around the world.
Post by V
So, as I told you, if you happen upon a person in pain or not living
by their religions creed give em a little help.
Yes, we are all here to help each other out...are we not?
We are here only because we are here. What purpose we make for ourselves
while we are here is up to us. But helping others is a worthy goal - so
long as you recognise your own limits.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...